Governance Rollout Strategy
Ledgerly Policies allow organizations to enforce audit logging discipline across their applications.
However, introducing governance rules in production can be risky if done incorrectly.
This guide describes how to safely roll out audit policies across teams and services using Ledgerly.
Why Governance Rollout Matters
Introducing audit governance affects:
- audit logging behavior
- developer workflows
- compliance reporting
- security observability
- tenancy attribution
- incident traceability
Policies may reject audit entries that previously would have been accepted.
If introduced abruptly, this can:
- break audit logging pipelines
- disrupt application monitoring
- cause unexpected runtime exceptions
- block audit persistence in production
Ledgerly provides Debug Mode to enable safe rollout.
Enforcement Modes
Ledgerly supports two policy modes:
Enforcement Mode
Policies are strictly enforced.
If a policy fails:
- an
EntryPolicyViolationis thrown - the audit entry is rejected
- persistence is aborted
This is suitable for:
- regulated environments
- hardened production deployments
- compliance enforcement
- mature logging systems
Debug Mode
Policies are advisory.
If a policy fails:
- the violation is logged
- the
EntryPolicyViolatedevent is dispatched - the audit entry is still persisted
Enable Debug Mode:
'policy' => [
'debug' => true,
],
This allows observing policy violations without affecting production logging.
Recommended Rollout Phases
Phase 1 — Observability
Enable Debug Mode and introduce initial policies.
Example:
'policies' => [
RequireActorPolicy::for('*.updated'),
RequireMetadataKeysPolicy::for(
'invoice.*',
['tenant_id']
),
RequireSeverityPolicy::for(
'security.*',
minimum: 'high'
),
],
Violations will now be:
- logged
- observable
- queryable
- reportable
Audit entries will still persist.
Phase 2 — Violation Monitoring
Subscribe to policy violations:
Event::listen(
EntryPolicyViolated::class,
function ($event) {
logger()->warning(
'Ledgerly Policy Violation',
[
'policy' => $event->violation->policy(),
'message' => $event->violation->getMessage(),
]
);
}
);
Track:
- violation frequency
- affected actions
- missing metadata
- severity misclassification
This helps identify:
- legacy logging patterns
- non-compliant services
- missing context propagation
- incomplete tenancy attribution
Phase 3 — Developer Remediation
Update logging calls across services:
- ensure actors are resolved
- attach required metadata
- propagate tenant identifiers
- include request identifiers
- classify severity levels
Example:
ledgerly()
->actor($user)
->action('invoice.updated')
->withMetadata([
'tenant_id' => $tenant->id,
'request_id' => $requestId,
])
->severity('high')
->log();
Phase 4 — Gradual Enforcement
Disable Debug Mode:
'policy' => [
'debug' => false,
],
Policy violations will now:
- throw exceptions
- reject non-compliant entries
- enforce audit discipline
Phase 5 — Policy Expansion
Introduce stricter policies over time:
- metadata completeness
- action naming rules
- domain restrictions
- severity thresholds
- tenancy requirements
Policies may also be introduced per-domain:
RequireMetadataKeysPolicy::for(
'billing.*',
['tenant_id']
);
CI Validation
Before deploying policy changes:
php artisan ledgerly:policy:check
This validates:
- class existence
- contract implementation
- constructor validity
- binding configuration
Best Practices
- Always introduce policies in Debug Mode
- Monitor violations before enforcing
- Avoid enforcing across all domains simultaneously
- Roll out domain-by-domain
- Keep policies stateless
- Avoid performing IO inside policies
Summary
Ledgerly Policies allow organizations to move from:
- unstructured logging
- inconsistent audit trails
- incomplete metadata
to:
- structured audit taxonomy
- traceable activity timelines
- compliance-ready audit records
Roll out policies gradually to ensure safe adoption across services.